Comments

Why SFR? — 10 Comments

  1. Great post, Kat. I never much liked straight SF. It always seemed there was something missing: the romance (duh). I’m so looking forward to the day I’m holding the shiny new Starskipper in my hands. πŸ™‚

  2. I really love reading SF and cyberpunk and always want to see stories that can meld the alternative reality and human dilemmas of the SF genre with the emotions of the romance genre. I keep waiting for SFR to just take off. One day…

    • Oh, please keep crossing your fingers that SF will take off! πŸ™‚ Thanks for stopping by – incidentally, you were one of the people I was thinking of when I mentioned I still like historical romance. It’s great that historical has remained popular all these years.

  3. Congrats on mailing your ms! I’m proud of you for letting go! πŸ™‚

    I used to love Buck Rogers (*beedeebeedee*) and Lost in Space as a kid. Nowadays, I’m not a huge science fiction buff just because they’re mostly about aliens, and the portrayal of them is usually lame. I love technology type science fiction, though, and I’ve LOVED the little bit of SFR I’ve read from you (can’t wait for more!), so for me, I think it’s about finding the right kind of sci-fi that invests me as a reader. Give me anything with complex relationships and lots of action and drama and romance and I’m intrigued.

    I’m here for brainstorming help when/if you need it! πŸ™‚

    • Thanks – the mailing part was almost as hard as the printing part…looooong lines at the post office. It’s funny, I’ve never been a huge fan of the alien side of SF, just mostly the cool technology. That must be why I love you so much. πŸ™‚ So yeah, there aren’t any monsterous type aliens in my books, just people with big time issues.

  4. I’m not sure about the genre thing because when I think about it, I love reading contemporary, paranormal romance, historical romance, and science fiction romance (my favorites, listed in reverse order). Why not write in the genres we love to read? As long as we have the voice for it, of course. Maybe that’s it. Maybe our voice work for some sub-genres better than others? I’m not sure.

    I would love to see SFR take off! πŸ™‚
    & I’m with Susan, can’t wait to see Starskipper!

    • Well, that’s an interesting point, about voice. I started writing contemporary because I was frustrated with how stilted my voice felt when I wrote SFR. Then I realized that I didn’t have to write SFR without my voice, I just needed to change my perception of what SFR was “supposed” to sound like. I hope that’s part of what will be appealing about my version of SFR…thanks for stopping by! I’m thrilled to have you here. And thanks for the encouragement.

  5. I fully support the mulit-genre approach, at least at this point in my life. (I reserve the right to change my mind once I’m published and pulling my hair out, ha!) As you pointed out, I’m not sure how else you can learn where you really fit. It does divide your (general you) time up, and it may not be the fastest approach to publication, but it gives you room to grow too, because it’s a challenge. As long as you don’t feel pulled in two directions, and so on.

    I am confident that you’ll be able to handle it. πŸ˜€

    Hey, semi-on-topic… Have you watched the remake of the tv show V? It’s in season 2 now. I’ve enjoyed the new one, plot holes and all. πŸ™‚

    CONGRATULATIONS ON MAILING! πŸ˜€

    • Are you kidding? OF COURSE I’m watching V. Elizabeth Mitchell is in it and she was my favorite character on LOST except for the parts where Sawyer wasn’t wearing a shirt. πŸ™‚ Thanks for the congrats and for stopping by! Keep all that snow over there, okay?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *